<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stopthehacker.com &#187; alexa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stopthehacker.com/tag/alexa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stopthehacker.com</link>
	<description>Jaal, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Popular Websites Host More Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.stopthehacker.com/2010/03/09/more-popular-websites-host-more-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stopthehacker.com/2010/03/09/more-popular-websites-host-more-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anirban</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online pharmacy spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stopthehacker.com/?p=1464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular Internet websites are a good place to advertise and therefore a target for spammers. Large throngs of visitors who view content on popular sites are the main draw. Spammers use vulnerabilities in message boards and forums to insert spam advertisements.
This &#8220;malvertising&#8221; is bad for the reputation of the website in question and because it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular Internet websites are a good place to advertise and therefore a target for spammers. Large throngs of visitors who view content on popular sites are the main draw. Spammers use vulnerabilities in message boards and forums to insert spam advertisements.</p>
<p>This &#8220;malvertising&#8221; is bad for the reputation of the website in question and because it opens up a Pandora&#8217;s box of security issues if a visitor decides to follow the link in the advertisement. In this short article we try to determine if certain subsets of the most popular 1 million Internet websites are more vulnerable to attack by spammers.</p>
<p><strong>Experiment Goals</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Where are the spammers targeting their efforts?</li>
<li>What kind of websites need to put more effort into stopping spammers?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong></p>
<p>We obtained a list of the top 1 million websites from <a href="http://www.alexa.com" target="_blank">Alexa</a>. We partitioned the list into 3 equal parts, designated as &#8220;top,&#8221; &#8220;middle&#8221; and &#8220;low&#8221; websites. From each subset, we randomly selected 1000 websites and determined if they were hosting spam advertisements.</p>
<p>To determine whether a site was hosting spam advertisements, we queried <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> and other search engines with a list of keywords suggesting pharmacy spam (e.g. &#8220;buy Kamagra cheap&#8221; and &#8220;no prescription needed&#8221;). Once a website was found to include spam advertisements, the suspect pages from that website were downloaded to ensure that spam advertisements were indeed present.</p>
<p><strong>Interesting Results</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The &#8220;top&#8221; tier was responsible for 9% of sites hosting spam ads.</li>
<li>The &#8220;middle&#8221; tier was responsible for 4% of sites hosting spam ads.</li>
<li>The &#8220;low&#8221; tier was responsible for 3% of sites hosting spam ads.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>It is surprising to see that &#8220;top&#8221; ranking websites were more than twice as likely to have spam advertisements on their web pages than &#8220;middle&#8221; or &#8220;low&#8221; ranking websites.</p>
<p>It could be that spammers prefer to concentrate on the most popular sites versus the not-so-popular ones or that popular sites have more discussion/message boards that can be exploited. This question could be the basis of a more in-depth study of this phenomenon.<br />
<span id="more-1464"></span><br />
<strong>Examples of websites that host spam advertisements</strong></p>
<p>Top sites:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">
www.pcd.go.th
www.blognone.com
www.howardforums.com
www.memeq.net
www.adrants.com
</pre>
<p>Middle sites:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">
www.rankarthai.com
www.pmg.org.za
</pre>
<p>Low sites:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain;">
www.nailshop.ro
www.simple-momreviews.com
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stopthehacker.com/2010/03/09/more-popular-websites-host-more-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
